To Understand Who We Are And where we Come From, We Must Look At Our Genetic Heritage.
For us To Understand magik In Modernity We In We have to first address its sources in antiquity
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
150,000 years ago the world was in an ice age
the ice caps advanced and sea levels dropped 400 feet, North Africa is a vast desert with small islands of green
on the islands were tiny groups of people
Hunter Gastherers
People lived in widely scattered groups
same brain
hunteer gqathers
Ate Seeds And Fruit Gtahered
Rebecca khan in 1987 published a paper proving that Mitichondria DNA markers go back to Africa.
Steven Oppenheimer paleo Anthropologist\
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Witches and witch doctors were once highly revered.
- Manly Palmer Hall
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now they are considered community threats.
Until the recent turn of the tide,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if a child exhibited special gifts he/she was given to the tribal shaman for training to step into their honorable destiny as healer.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christian colonialism has reinforced that the only true witch doctor is Jesus.
This all smacks of Salem, the Crusades…
understand our historical link to the witches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The terms “witch” and “wise woman” actually had their origins in ancient Kemet (Egypt’s true name, meaning Land of the Blacks). Wadj (or Uadj) is a Kemetic word meaning"power, health, green, water.
“ A wadj scepter represents a tied bundle of herbs for health andprosperity.
A variant of the word is Udja (pronounced WOO-jah), where the term Ouija board isalso derived from. The Mdw Ntr (hieroglyphic symbol) is believed by many to actually represent a mortar and pestle. Another variant is Ujdat (WOO-chaht), the name for theprotective amulet representing the Eye of Heru, which is comprised of the protective psychic/magickal energies of Wadjet and her sister Nekehebet (who are actually Ast/Isis and her sister Neb-t Het). Wadjet (Uadjet, Uachet) is a term for a strong magickal woman who can suddenly bend energy for healing.
Much of the Yoruba language and traditions can be traced directly to Kemet.
Aje (ah-JZAY) is a Yoruba term meaning witch. The Aje is an energy like Wadjet.
The Aje are symbolized asbirds, who lovingly, fiercely protect their witch queen Oshun.
Anyone who offends Oshun must answer to the Aje, or witches.
A little known Yoruba prophecy says that balance will not be resrored on the planet until the Aje have risen to their rightful places once more.
Anglo-Saxons claim the word witch came from wicca. However, an early, older variant of the word in their language was wicce, pronounced "weecha.” Wicce meant a wise woman/wiseman healer.
Wadjet. Weecha. Witch.
Also for the record, the Kemetic term for wise woman, “Rekhut, Rekhuit, Rekhit, Rekhat,"means "skilled in words, knowledge, and craft.”
The Rekhut was believed to have mastery of and work with the Uadjenergy.
Rekhut was also a name for Ast (Isis), recognized and honored today as a witch because she represents the ultimate female magickal healer.
With this rich history and prophecy of hope based on the strength of witches, it is sorrowful that people have fearfully turned against the power source that will heal humanity.
Stand strong in our proud tradition.
We are the witches. We have returned.
witches of color witch of color black witch black witches witch witches witchcraft witchblr afro witches afro witch kemetic witch kemetic kemet yoruba magick black spirituality african spirituality hoodoo reiki rootworker rootworkers hoodoo practitioner reiki practitioner reiki healer energy worker energy workers energy work voodoo vodoun isis
It is time for people of African descent to reclaim and
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The incomplete list of people with black skin in Herodotus:
Egyptians – seen as having the most ancient civilization, way older than Greece.
Ethiopians (Nubians, etc) – live south of Egypt. Meroe is their mother city (2.29). Civilized but not as civilized as Egypt (2.30). They once ruled Egypt (2.100, 137-139). Herodotus seems to apply the term “Ethiopian” to more than just Nubians: he also talks about long-lived Ethiopians (3.17-26, 97) and cave-dwelling Ethiopians (4.183). Most of them would have been Nilo-Saharans.
Asian Ethiopians (Dravidians?) – look just like Ethiopians but their hair is straight instead of woolly. They serve in the Persian army in their own divisions as part of the Indian contingent (7.70).
Colchians – live on the eastern shore of the Black Sea. Because they have black skin, woolly hair and practise circumcision, Herodotus says they are clearly Egyptian (2.104).
short men (Pygmies?) – live along what is probably the Niger River (2.32-33) and somewhere on the west coast of Africa (4.43). They live in cities. Those along the Niger practise sorcery. Those on the coast, called dwarfs, wear clothes made of palm leaves.
Other Africans: Herodotus talks about the people who live along the coast between Egypt and Carthage (4.168-180) and along the caravan route that goes west across the Sahara (4.181-199). He does not bring up their skin colour, but remarks on the long hair of those who live along the coast. Most of them would have been Berbers.
In Africa, Herodotus visited Egypt and, just to the west, Cyrene. The rest he knows about from asking questions, particularly in Egypt.
Cicero called Herodotus the “Father of History”. Plutarch called him the “father of lies”. Herodotus felt his duty was to report what he had seen and heard. He expresses doubts about some of what he reports, but puts it out there to let readers come to their own conclusions.
Source: Herodotus, “History” (425 BC). See above for book and section numbers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diop:
Whence came this name Ham (Cham, Kam)? Where could Moses have found it? Right in Egypt where Moses was born, grew up and lived until the Exodus. In fact, we know the Egyptians called their country Kemit, which means “black” in their language. The interpretation according to which Kemit designates the black soil of Egypt, rather than the black man and, by extension, the black race of the country of the Blacks, stems from a gratuitous distortion by minds aware of what an exact interpretation of this word would imply. Hence it is natural to find Kam in Hebrew, meaning heat, black, burned.
Diop says that the Jews got most of the elements of their civilization from Egypt too: they came to Egypt as a small band of shepherds in the time of Joseph and lived there for 400 years. Their belief in one God, for example, goes back to that of Akhenaten, who ruled Egypt about a hundred years before Moses.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
« Programming Note #15Diop: Birth of the Negro Myth »
Diop: What were the Egyptians?
Fri Jul 15th 2011 by abagond
The following is based on “What were the Egyptians?”, chapter one of Cheikh Anta Diop’s “The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality” (1974). The pictures were supplied by me, not Diop.
The Greeks and Jews saw the ancient Egyptians first-hand before they became mixed with Greek and Arab blood. They never thought of them as looking like the people in the Middle East or Europe. They saw them as cousins of the Ethiopians and used the word “black” when talking about them.
For example, when Herodotus argues that the people on the island of Colchis came from Egypt, he says:
The Egyptians said they believed the Colchians to be descended from the army of Sesostris. My own conjectures were founded, first, on the fact that they are black-skinned and have woolly hair…
One of the reasons he gives for why the rising of the Nile is not caused by melting snow is that, “It is certain that the natives of the country are black with the heat…”
When talking about an oracle he uses the blackness of a dove to argue that it stands for an Egyptian woman.
Some say Herodotus was simply a teller of tales, yet he was careful to point out what he saw with his own eyes, what he heard and what made sense. Egypt is something he saw with his own eyes. Archaeology continues to back up his eyewitness accounts.
Herodotus said that Egypt was the cradle of civilization, that the Greeks got all the elements of their civilization from Egypt – even their gods.
Queen Tiye, wife of Amenhotep III, -1300s.
The Greeks Herodotus, Diodorus of Sicily and Strabo all believed that the Egyptians and Ethiopians were of the same race: that either the Egyptians came from the Ethiopians or the Ethiopians came from the Egyptians – depending on whether they saw the Nile as being settled upstream or downstream.
It was not just the Greeks. The Jews who wrote the Bible saw it pretty much the same way too. For example, they said that after the Flood Egypt and Ethiopia were both settled by the sons of Ham.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,000 years ago (4000 BC): Civilizations develop in the Mesopotamia/Fertile Crescent region (around the location of modern-day Iraq).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6000 Years Ago
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humans began altering natural world 6,000 years ago
By Robert Sanders, Media relations| DECEMBER 16, 2015
EmailPrint
Scientists have found an abrupt change about 6,000 years ago in how terrestrial plant and animal species coexisted, right about the time human populations were ballooning and agriculture was spreading around the world.
Egyptian farmers 5,000 years ago
Egyptian farmers in the Neolithic period 5,000-6,000 years ago.
The findings suggest that human activity had reached a tipping point where hunting and farming were impacting the natural world in irreversible ways — changes that have continued to increase to this day.
The researchers, including UC Berkeley’s Cindy Looy, an assistant professor of integrative biology, will report their findings in the Dec. 17 issue of the journal Nature.
The scientists looked at fossil data on how species coexisted over the past 307 million years, specifically how often a particular pair of plant or animal species is found within the same community. Out of all possible combinations of two species in a certain region and time interval, the proportion of pairs of species that co-occurred remained relatively stable until 6,000 years ago. At that time, the chances of co-occurrence dropped significantly, suggesting that humans were creating some barrier to the dispersal of plants or animals.
“This tells us that humans have been having a massive effect on the environment for a very long time,” said lead author S. Kathleen Lyons, a paleobiologist in the Evolution of Terrestrial Ecosystems (ETE) program at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.
Analyses of modern communities of plants and animals have found that for most pairs of species, the presence of one species within a community does not influence whether the other is present or absent. For pairs where there is an association, most occur within the same community less frequently than expected, suggesting some influence keeps them apart.
But when Lyons, Looy and their colleagues investigated the composition of ancient communities using fossil data, they found exactly the opposite. Their analysis showed that from 307 million years ago, the time known as the Carboniferous period, to about 6,000 years ago, in the Holocene epoch, there was a pattern of pairs of species occurring together within communities rather than being segregated.
“The proportion of co-occurring species pairs was relatively stable from the late Paleozoic until 6,000 years ago, even during periods of major climate change and mass extinction and despite the appearance of many new players in the terrestrial ecosystems, such as mammals and flowering plants,” Looy said. “The decline of coupled species pairs in the Holocene also cannot be explained by the transition from the last glacial to the current interglacial at the end of the Pleistocene, as this happened too early. Instead, it is more likely caused by an increase in human population size and the resulting land use and agriculture.”
Around the time co-occurrence patterns changed, humans were becoming increasingly dependent on agriculture, a cultural shift that physically altered the environment and would have introduced artificial barriers to dispersal never seen before. Even at low levels of agriculture and other human impacts, there was a detectable shift in co-occurrence structure, indicating that species were not able to migrate as easily as they did for the previous 300 million years.
For more details about the study, see this story on the Smithsonian’s website.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What the DNA says:
Present-day Egyptians are, by blood, about 60% Eurasian, like the Arabs who took over their country, and 40% black African. In the past they were, if anything, blacker because since the glory days of Ancient Egypt they have been taken over by the Persians, Greeks, Romans and Arabs. But even at 40% black they easily count as black according to America’s One Drop Rule, which sees even a drop of black African blood (in practice, about 10% or more) as enough to make you black.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By
Chelsea Harvey
By Chelsea Harvey
Email
Bio
Follow
Dec. 16, 2015 at 1:33 p.m. EST
There’s no doubt that humans have changed the face of the planet in countless ways since we first arose as the dominant species on Earth. Many of our most obvious impacts have become apparent in the past century or so, with the rise of concerns about climate change, habitat destruction, pollution and the loss of biodiversity.
But new research reminds us that humans have actually been reshaping the planet for thousands of years, in ways we’re only just beginning to understand.
A paper published Wednesday in Nature suggests that human activities caused a major shift about 6,000 years ago in the way plant and animal communities were structured on Earth — this was after the start of the geological epoch known as the “Holocene,” an era which includes the growth of human populations and their rising influence around the globe. The study compared data from the fossil record with observations from the modern era to reach its conclusions.
Published: 16 December 2015
Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts
S. Kathleen Lyons, Kathryn L. Amatangelo, […]Nicholas J. Gotelli
Nature volume 529, pages80–83(2016)Cite this article
1546 Accesses
83 Citations
321 Altmetric
Metricsdetails
A Corrigendum to this article was published on 24 August 2016
This article has been updated
Abstract
Understanding how ecological communities are organized and how they change through time is critical to predicting the effects of climate change1. Recent work documenting the co-occurrence structure of modern communities found that most significant species pairs co-occur less frequently than would be expected by chance2,3. However, little is known about how co-occurrence structure changes through time. Here we evaluate changes in plant and animal community organization over geological time by quantifying the co-occurrence structure of 359,896 unique taxon pairs in 80 assemblages spanning the past 300 million years. Co-occurrences of most taxon pairs were statistically random, but a significant fraction were spatially aggregated or segregated. Aggregated pairs dominated from the Carboniferous period (307 million years ago) to the early Holocene epoch (11,700 years before present), when there was a pronounced shift to more segregated pairs, a trend that continues in modern assemblages. The shift began during the Holocene and coincided with increasing human population size4,5 and the spread of agriculture in North America6,7. Before the shift, an average of 64% of significant pairs were aggregated; after the shift, the average dropped to 37%. The organization of modern and late Holocene plant and animal assemblages differs fundamentally from that of assemblages over the past 300 million years that predate the large-scale impacts of humans. Our results suggest that the rules governing the assembly of communities have recently been changed by human activity.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------